Copyleaks
Detects AI-generated text and plagiarism for editorial, enterprise, and education.
Last verified Jun 16, 2026
Detects AI-generated text and plagiarism for editorial, enterprise, and education.
Last verified Jun 16, 2026
Fast-read signals for fit, pricing, and trust.
Copyleaks is a content-integrity platform that detects AI-generated text and plagiarism, with a writing assistant, API, LMS integration, and a browser extension. It is aimed at editorial teams, enterprises, and educational institutions governing content and originality. Detection plus plagiarism at organisational scale is its angle. Detection is probabilistic, so flagged text informs a human judgement rather than proving how something was written.
You submit text and it assesses whether it appears AI-generated and checks it against sources for plagiarism, with an API and LMS integration for institutions, a browser extension, and writing-assistant features around the core checks.
It suits publishers, enterprises, and universities that need to govern AI use and protect originality across many documents and users, not just spot-check one.
Detection is a probability, not a verdict — human and AI writing overlap and no detector is perfect — so flagged text warrants a human review, and accuracy varies by language and content.
Quick fit check against how you actually work.
What you can actually do with this tool.
Assesses whether text appears AI-generated for content-integrity review.
Checks text against sources to flag matching passages.
Exposes an API to embed checks into a workflow at scale.
Connects to learning systems for educational use.
Brings checks into the browser for in-place review.
Adds writing-assistant features around the core checks.
Pricing tiers and what's included in each.
A limited free AI detector is available. Paid Personal plans start at $16.99 per month ($13.99/month billed annually).
A short path to first value.
Common questions about this tool, answered.
It's probabilistic — human and AI writing overlap, so results indicate likelihood and should guide a human review rather than prove how text was written.
Yes — false positives are possible, so treat flags as a prompt to examine a passage, not a conclusion.
An API and LMS integration target editorial, enterprise, and education use at scale rather than one-off checks.
Data handling is buyer-relevant at scale, so confirm the current privacy and retention terms before submitting sensitive work.
Context for choosing between this tool and alternatives.
Detection tools differ on audience; Copyleaks leans to editorial, enterprise, and education with API and LMS reach, while Winston AI adds image detection and reports, GPTZero focuses on text classification, and ZeroGPT bundles extra utilities. Compare on whether organisational integration or a focused detector fits.
Other tools that show up for the same kind of work.
GPTZero
Freemium
Undetectable AI
Paid